The
Oregonian is reporting that doctors who receive money from medical device makers have to divulge that to their patients as a potential conflict of interest.
The case could ripple nationwide, exposing a little-known but common
practice of payments to doctors from implant manufacturers. Locally, for
instance, the practice is tolerated by the biggest hospitals in the
state who do not require patients be informed of such payments. The DOJ
case could do for the artificial-implant makers what similar court cases
did for drug companies' payments to doctors, says Jerry Avorn, a Harvard Medical School professor who has written about the ethics of undisclosed physician payments.
"The patient has a right to expect that whatever device is implanted
or procedure is recommended is a decision that is based solely on what
that patient would most benefit from," he said, calling the case
"potentially so important."
Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act
requires that professionals disclose this sort of information when
providing services. And by failing to, the doctors were leading the
patient to believe they were free of any conflict of interest and doing
the implants "for the exclusive benefit of the patient ... when this was
not the case," according to the DOJ.
I'm glad to see this practice receiving more scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for relevance and civility. Spam is discarded.