There are alliances forming on the political landscape that I thought I'd never see happen in my lifetime. The
NRA has joined the ACLU lawsuit over government spying, the rationale given by the NRA is that the government could use their information trove to punish NRA members and gun owners in general.
The NRA, in an amicus brief in support of the ACLU, argues that the mass surveillance
program provides "the government not only with the means of
identifying members and others who communicate with the NRA and other
advocacy groups, but also with the means of identifying gun owners
without their knowledge or consent".
Meanwhile on the
Syria debate, John Kerry and John McCain are making nice with each other along with Saxby Chambliss, but Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) are opposed.
But the vote exposed deep schisms in both parties. Two of the
committee’s most liberal members — Udall and Murphy — voted no, while
Markey, another liberal champion, declined to take a position. Among
Republicans, Corker, Flake and McCain — generally considered
establishment party members who have supported other Obama
administration policies in recent months — agreed with the Democratic
majority, while five of their GOP colleagues, including two considering
presidential campaigns, voted no.
The Rubio and Paul votes are most notable and serve as the first
opportunity to put potential 2016 candidates on the record on an
important foreign policy matter. Their no votes likely make it difficult
for other would-be GOP presidential candidates, including Sen. Ted Cruz
(R-Tex.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), to support any resolution.
The committee vote was close — but not along party lines — a good
reminder that military engagement in Syria has scrambled the two parties
and two chambers like few other issues in recent years.
Wow, what's next, does Peter DeFazio become a Republican?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for relevance and civility. Spam is discarded.