We finally have a
felony conviction, aiding and abetting tax evasion, for the major bank Credit Suisse, but what are the penalties? For starters the bank will be fined $2.6 billion, a fair hunk of change to be sure, but the CEO Brady Dougan said this in a press statement, so where's the beef?
Dougan said the settlement had had little impact on business. “We have found no instances where clients cannot do business with us,” he said. “Our discussions with clients have been very reassuring and we haven’t seen very many issues at all.”
So much for feeling too much pain, now does he go to jail? Not a chance in my opinion, even if Switzerland extradited him which they won't. Then there's the matter of the tax evaders, Credit Suisse hasn't been required to reveal who they are so the IRS can collect taxes from them, as well as prosecute them. That has Senators Carl Levin and John McCain puzzled too after they did all the investigative work that led to the conviction.
Senators Carl Levin and John McCain welcomed the $2.6bn fine of the bank announced Monday but said more needed to be done. Levin and McCain led the permanent subcommittee on investigations team that uncovered much of the wrongdoing at the bank.
He said the fine struck “an important blow against tax evasion through bank secrecy”.
“But it is a mystery to me why the US government didn’t require as part of the agreement that the bank cough up some of the names of the US clients with secret Swiss bank accounts. More than 20,000 Americans were Credit Suisse account holders in Switzerland, the vast majority of whom never disclosed their accounts as required by US law. This leaves their identities undisclosed, with no accountability for taxes owed. The changes Credit Suisse has agreed to make to its practices are long overdue and welcome, but must be carefully monitored,” he
said.
McCain said he was “gratified” by the Justice Department’s decision to require Credit Suisse to plead guilty to criminal wrongdoing. “In such cases, it is vitally important for all Americans to know that no financial institution is ‘too big to prosecute,’” he said. But he added that questions remained.
“Over the next few days, I look forward to reviewing this guilty plea closely to see whether it appropriately holds officers, directors and key executives individually accountable and whether the plea will be sufficient to help deter similar misconduct in the future,” he said.
In
The Guardian story, they interviewed
John Coffee, Adolf A Berle professor of law at Columbia Law School, and he said.
“It is less than a severe sanction when no officers are indicted, when the settlement does not require the dismissal of any employees and where they do not get the names of these US customers,” he said. He said other regulators could take further action, the SEC could bar it from being a money manager, but that was not going to happen.
“Mary Jo White [chair of the SEC] does not want to inconvenience a major bank over a little thing like a federal felony conviction,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for relevance and civility. Spam is discarded.