Senator
Ron Wyden has a warning for our country.
“The combination of increasingly advanced technology with a breakdown in
the checks and balances that limit government action could lead us to a
surveillance state that cannot be reversed.”
There was an amendment in the House limiting warrantless surveillance that was proposed to be attached to the Defense Appropriations bill, but the amendment was voted down
Senate Intelligence Committee Chair Dianne Feinstien (D-CA) and
Ranking Member Saxby Chambliss (R-GA), however, found the Amash-Conyers
amendment to go too far, issuing a joint statement
saying “that any amendments to defund the program on appropriations
bills would be unwise.” When ThinkProgress asked whether he disagreed
with the two, Wyden demurred. “I can’t speculate on something I haven’t
seen,” he said, adding that “I think it is a very, very healthy thing
that the House is having a debate and starting the effort to expose the
false choice” between privacy and security.
Snowden has been criticized for the way in which he chose to reveal
the programs listed. Given his emphasis on his efforts to work within
Senate rules on classification to reveal to the American public the
extent of these programs, ThinkProgress asked Wyden whether he
considered the process in which Snowden leaked that information to be
irresponsible. Wyden noted that it’s his policy not to comment on
individuals charged criminally, as Snowden has been, and that “this is a
debate that should have been started by elected officials, not Mr.
Snowden, and I feel very strongly about that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for relevance and civility. Spam is discarded.